You have no items in your bag.
Let us help!
Free Shipping over £35
Inspired By J’Adore
Inspired By Oud Satin Mood
Inspired By Santal 33
Inspired By Good Girl
Inspired By Imagination
Inspired By Libre
Inspired By Ombre Nomade
Inspired By Bleu de Chanel
Inspired By Sauvage (Parfum)
Inspired By Hacivat
Free Delivery on Orders over £35 - Free Returns
Searching...
No products found. Try a different search term.
We tested our luxury inspired perfume against the £250 original:
an honest verdict for anyone who has ever winced at a price tag
There is a particular kind of pain that happens in the perfume section of a department store. You are minding your own business, possibly killing time before meeting a friend, when a confident person in a white coat appears with a tester strip (bordering on pushy, but commission is commission) and suddenly you are standing in the middle of Selfridges holding something that smells absolutely extraordinary and costs two hundred and fifty quid. You put it down. You think about it on the way home. You think about it in the bath. You think about it again three weeks later when you still have not stopped thinking about it.
That is more or less the origin story for every inspired fragrance brand that has ever existed, including this one. The question that actually matters is whether a quality inspired version can get close enough to be worth your time and money. We ran the tests. Here is what we found.
We tested our bestsellers side by side against the designer originals they are inspired by. Same person, same skin, same day. Both applied to pulse points and left to develop without interference. We tracked the opening, the heart, and the dry-down, giving each fragrance proper time to settle rather than drawing conclusions after a hasty sniff the way you might in a rush at the Boots fragrance counter on your lunch break after you hit the Pret for a baguette and just before you pick up a cortado at the artisanal bakery.
The results were more consistent than some people expect, and in a couple of cases they surprised us too.
Baccarat Rouge 540 by Maison Francis Kurkdjian is, at this point, a cultural phenomenon. It retails at around £270 for 70ml from the MFK counter at Harrods or Liberty. It smells like nothing else: jasmine, saffron, ambergris, and cedar with a quality that is warm and faintly synthetic in the best possible way. It became the most talked-about fragrance of the last decade because it smells like nothing that came before it. There is a reason every perfume lover in the country has a strong opinion about it.
Addiction, our version inspired by Baccarat Rouge 540, opens in the same territory. The saffron and jasmine are immediately there, and the amber and cedar base develops in a way that tracks closely with the original throughout the day. The dry-down is where differences between inspired fragrances and originals most often show up, and here the gap is narrow. The warmth is there. That particular quality that makes the original so memorable, the slightly sweet, slightly metallic depth, comes through.
The biggest practical difference: Addiction is a couple of tenners. Baccarat Rouge 540 is £270. Both lasted a full day on moisturised skin in our test. The inspired version does not come with the Kurkdjian brand experience, the weighty glass bottle, or the knowledge that your fragrance costs more than most weekly Tesco food shops for a family of 4. What it does come with is the scent, which is the part you are actually wearing.
Fierce vs Sauvage Parfum by Dior: the men's fragrance test
Sauvage Parfum by Dior needs very little introduction. It has been one of the most celebrated men's fragrances in the world for years and it earns the position. The Parfum concentration is the most intense version: ambroxan and pink pepper over a rich, woody base with genuine projection. It retails at around £130 for 100ml, which is the kind of price that makes you consider all of your life decisions at the checkout. And for weeks later.
Fierce, inspired by Sauvage Parfum, carries the same ambroxan signature. The pepper opening, the warm woody base, the projection that earns a comment before you have had a chance to sit down. We wore both on the same day on opposite wrists and asked a range of people, none of whom work in fragrance, which was the designer version. Most could not reliably pick it. One person preferred Fierce. That is not a peer-reviewed study, but it is also not nothing.
For anyone shopping men's fragrance UK wide and trying to avoid the particular grimace that comes with spending £130 on something you then feel too precious to wear on an average day you’re having a cream tea with your aunty Pam. Fierce is the most direct route to that Sauvage profile at a price you can actually reach for without thinking twice
Coco Mademoiselle is the benchmark for a certain kind of feminine fragrance. Clean, grown-up, and instantly recognisable. It has been the top-selling women's perfume in the UK for years, which is a remarkable achievement in a market this competitive. The EDP retails at around £120 for 100ml, and you will find it in every Boots or John Lewis and every pharmacy or department store in between for a reason.Timeless Grace opens with the same fresh orange and bergamot, develops through jasmine and rose, and settles into a warm patchouli base that wears beautifully throughout the day. The comparison here produced the closest result of the three: on dry-down, both fragrances sat in the same warm, clean territory. The original has a very slight additional depth in the base that reflects a higher concentration of raw materials, but it is a difference you would only notice if you were specifically looking for it, tester strip in hand, in the fragrance hall at Fortnum and Mason with nothing else to do.
At around twenty quid versus £120, Timeless Grace makes a compelling case for anyone who loves the Coco Mademoiselle profile but would rather wear it every single day without eking it out like the last of the Nutella in the jar you have to make last until payday.
Across all three tests, the differences between inspired fragrances and originals came down to the same three things.
Concentration of raw materials. Designer houses use extremely high concentrations of expensive ingredients. The originals have a richness in the base that reflects this. A well-made inspired fragrance gets close, but the very finest nuances of a £250 bottle sometimes live in those base notes, and it is worth knowing that going in rather than expecting an identical experience.
Projection in the opening. Top notes on the originals tend to radiate a little further in the first thirty minutes. If you are heading somewhere and want to make an immediate impression stepping off the train at Waterloo Station and weaving through the throngs of humanity, the original does have a slight edge there. If you are wearing something all day for your own pleasure, the difference matters considerably less.
Longevity on dry skin. Both perform significantly better on moisturised skin. On bare, dry skin the originals hold on a touch longer. Twelve seconds of unscented moisturiser before you spray closes that gap considerably on both sides.
The verdict
If you have been spending £150 or more on a bottle of fragrance and wearing it sparingly because it feels too precious for an ordinary day, a quality inspired alternative is worth trying properly. Not as a consolation prize. As a genuine option.
The question is not whether it smells exactly the same. It is whether it smells good enough to wear every day, with confidence, at a price that means you actually will. For the fragrances in the Scentspired range, the answer is yes. Browse the full collection for perfume online shopping any time, with every fragrance listed by notes and inspiration so you know exactly what you are getting before you spend a penny.
Start
The bestsellers page is the right place to start. Pick one you already know you love in its original form. Try the inspired version.
